Quotes About My Mom With Cancer

Justice on contract



There was much talk of issues and Swiss situations lately. It's time to travel a bit. So good I still have to warn you ... When you travel in thought on a blog ethics there is a risk of cross heavy issues that affect many people, and very difficult to solve. Or rather, the risk is starting to see these issues, which otherwise would come to our doors and into our pockets without you noticing. Probably prefers we do not see them. Perhaps because they are difficult to solve precisely.

For our mobile chocolate, medicines that save us life to diamonds indicate that the pass with another , it is become very rare that we make anything in a way that, say, call our unqualified endorsement like that. Watch this video. But then until the end. The beginning is simply depressing. The difficulty here is not to diagnose the problem. The watch is seen. No, what is difficult is to find solutions realistic enough not to be mere expressions of good will. It is therefore fortunate that some do yoke, and attempting to do precisely that. It's the end of video that. Small solutions to the needs, perhaps. But if something like that really works can we still say it is small?

These solutions, some of you are probably better able to evaluate me. So tell us. Realistic? Helpful? Good idea? No?

And if you know of other solutions, even partial, list them in comments. After watching this video, it will be very interested ...

Voice In Bounty Commercial

a concert designed by an artist officially, I mean (David Prudhomme, the talented author of rebetiko, among others).

What Is The Pin The British Is Wearing

Euthanasia not guilty

Beautiful judgment the acquittal of Dr. Daphne Berner . Reassuring, too. In part because of relief for this courageous colleague who tells so frankly and so its history . But this is not the only reason. Some explanations:

First, I'm not going to retell the story. If you're in Switzerland you know it, and if you do not know you find here.

Then ask for the frame, it is indeed a case of euthanasia. Or, to put it in Swiss law, of 'killing on request of the victim'. We heard about 'assisted suicide assets, but this term does not help to understand. The difference between assisted suicide (where a person is kills with the help of another person) and euthanasia (or someone kills another at his request) is in the acting person. This ruling reaffirms that difference. And here is euthanasia.

Daphne Berner has been paid, regardless. And not to be a defender of euthanasia law to find that reassuring. Why? First, the decision (re) asserts that suffering may be the reason a necessity. Necessity is the case of force majeure. The situation where a law violation is the only way of averting the emergency a serious and imminent. Conventionally, for example, to save a life. But here, precisely, is the suffering of the patient, not his death, which is to remove the imminent danger. The acquittal is pronounced here despite the fact that a law has been violated, because in these circumstances Daphne Berner "had no alternative but to violate Article 114 of the Penal Code to ensure the physical integrity , psychological, human dignity and the will of the patient " . See the suffering in question as well as reason enough to justify the heavy state of necessity, yes it is reassuring.

Then, focusing on patient request, the ruling remains focused on the autonomy of people sick. It is sometimes feared that the possibility of voluntary death opens the door to ... unintentional death. This ruling clearly does nothing of the sort.

Finally, basing the payment on the state of necessity, this ruling remains focused on the particular case. Euthanasia is, in many countries, sometimes heated debate where defending policy positions too often seems more important than seeing the real difficulties faced by people. In a situation as delicate, it can be tempting to try a case, one way or another, like a pretext case the main reason would be to become a precedent. But if I understand this ruling it, and if I may say so, my respects to the judge. This ruling is not yet known whether it will be maintained since an appeal is still possible. But it's a nice gesture. Prudent, intelligent, balanced. And one reason is precisely that, contrary to what some supporters of the legalization of euthanasia may wish, it does not seem so clear a precedent for cases in which euthanasia would planned. is a decision that the individual can do in a case without it too quickly pulled to the general. In other words, it is human rather than political. This centering

on the specifics of the case is also another reason for the unanimous support Daphne Berner following his acquittal. It tells of a case. One person. No big words. And this differentiates it from too many participants in the debate on voluntary death, which often causes defend first. So yes, of course, the causes are based on principles and it does not protect anyone without principles. But. Facing a real dilemma, where he will sacrifice something that sacrificing yourself first: a person or a principle? The ruling in this case, the primacy of the patient he says.

So now what will happen? Mystery. Will we legalize euthanasia? We will certainly talk about it, anyway. But whatever the outcome of that debate, start with a case like this, well, it also is reassuring.

Restricted Vs Unavailable Phone Calls

drawn together puzzles, or break fingers.

How Many Calories In A Homemade Soup

Diary plays Hendrix Modern Parisian Laundry

Lisa Loeb Voice Commercial Bounty

Berlin Friedrichshain

Kates Playground Masterbates Shower

Ah ben voilà ...


... it was not that difficult, right? Pope, yes, found a way to explain that in some circumstances the use of condoms was ok, not ideal for him, but still acceptable.

Well, okay, he way to catch . And now, to the praise of the planet, some hurried to minimize what actually would have really changed . It's a shame. But whatever. To those who really wrong, it can not be asked for more. Less harm is already very good. And less harmful when one calls a spiritual guide to more than one billion people, it's very ... very ... important.

A good point, therefore, to Benedict XVI. Those who watch the soul may find its late response and reticent. They regret it. But in medicine we care about the effects first. If it can prevent from becoming healthy sick, protect life, keep whole families threatened, and incidentally reduce world poverty, then we are takers.

Activemoviewindow Power Dvd

big in mozambique




In the photo, the cover announcing the Imperial Tiger Orchestra concert in Maputo, capital of Mozambique. With a drawing I made the Olympic Café, Paris 18, there are indeed two years of this ...

Ny Temporary Visitor Expire

Rappaz: the fourth option?

Should Bernard Rappaz release to save his life, since the forced nutrition is not applicable ? Difficult question, which seems to divide the public romand and federal parliamentarians. The Grand Council Valais must address his request for clemency on Thursday 18 November. Maybe calls 'last chance' have an influence, but now he would say, very surprising that the Grace be granted.

That said, it is important to understand that the issue of a release is not limited to this request for clemency. To understand the problem as it arises more realistically, three points are important here: First

one you've probably all aware:

1) A suspended sentence is not a grace
It is also a release, but without shortening of the total sentence. Three days out of prison in these circumstances is to add three days in prison later. This question, which is also on the table, not necessarily those of the Grand Council but that the situation in any case is very different from that of a pardon.

Also:

2) Suspend the sentence of a dying man is the norm in Switzerland, not an exception
Dying in prison is a human drama. A drama that has become superimposed, and which is not contemplated by the sentence which the inmate was convicted. Accordingly, when the death of an inmate incarcerated in Switzerland is predictable, it is usual that an application for release is sent to the judge. Allowing a prisoner who is not-or more dangerous to die free is an honorable request. To which the response, in Switzerland, is usually positive. If what matters is not to make an exception for Bernard Rappaz, so let him die in prison so that he would seek a suspension on these grounds would be quite inconsistent. That would ultimately make an exception in his case . By refusing to release him to die, it would do to him as we do not for others. Accept a suspension of sentence for this reason is not so make him an exception. So it's a crisis that could eventually, perhaps, be acceptable to all.
And then if he resumed eating and eventually died does not? It simply resume its barely ...

3) Any suspension of sentence may be conditioned by the dangerousness of the inmate
Some people who have called for the suspension of the penalty Rappaz also raised the issue that arises in the case of a strike from hunger by a dangerous inmate. It is a very good question. But this is not one that arises now. Suspend the sentence of a prisoner recognized by all as non-hazardous, taking explicitly into account that it is not dangerous, would not last for that other type of case.


It is important to understand all that. So yes, of course, perhaps a suspension of sentence in any case seem unacceptable to the authorities of Valais. Even in a context where other prisoners would have obtained. It has also seen the most recent law of Switzerland on the hunger strike, that of Neuchatel, let die a prisoner hunger strike, "if the person does so in good conscience and will. " And even if we imagine that the authorities willingly Neuchâtel would first try to find an arrangement that avoids this end, we imagine that in some cases it may be regarded as the least worst options available.

The case of Bernard Rappaz Will he considered such a situation? It is not excluded. But it is important to understand that accepting a suspension for health reasons or for reasons of end of life, would not he make an exception. This is important because the Valais authorities should be able, if they wish, make that choice without being accused of succumbing to blackmail. They would in this case not alter the normal application of penalties, precisely. They would have done to him exactly like any other. Neither more nor less.

Maybe I'm wrong in this analysis. Your comments are welcome as usual. But it seems that if we want is to both avoid an exception, and avoid subjecting an inmate to inhuman and degrading , and avoid leaving it to die, well this time it is possible .. .

Watch Free Hd Bangbross .com

Treating Cholera Cases



Normally I'm not strictly medical post on this blog.

But once will not hurt. Because looking at the keywords that lead people here, I am regularly affected by those seeking how to treat cholera . Fall here when looking for clinical, it must be disappointing. If you are looking for how to treat cholera, so the message is written expressly for you. I put a link to the recipe of rehydration salts in a previous post, but this team has made a video. It shows , without words so without a language barrier, how to save a life with, ultimately, the means of edges. Attention is also demonstrated how recognize cholera, and certain images are ... ahem ... clinics. Perhaps difficult to see. If the subject does not interest you, do not look. This blog is still a blog Bioethics, worry, This message is a parenthesis.

But there as cholera continue to plague Haiti , the more the better video is available ...

How To Get Shiny Pokemon In Pearl

comment: Doctors and the Federal Court Judgement of Multiple Loves

You have the courage to even a message on nutrition enforced? Well, this time I will "cheat" and make a case comment. For these times, everyone seems to have an opinion on what to do with the decision of 26 August of TF in the case between the DSAS Valais Bernard Rappaz.

should apply. And they say that doctors are opposed to this. Apply it, yes. And I said, I do not think that physicians are opposed to it actually . Maybe you have another opinion? Give it. But first read the decision. It is a document worth reading. Well, I know, it's not necessarily easy legal access. But you're smart people. And it is not so long, it contains many interesting things, and it keeps the time being misquoted. So for ease of reading (the search tool of the jurisprudence of the TF is not the easiest of the world), I've put online. Here is the link, in words:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/ 40434339/Arret-TF-6B-599-2 DSAS 010-Valais-vs-Rappaz

And if you know someone who needs to read it, thank you to move ...

As this is a case to comment, and that the goal is not to debate stop, I said the question for the comments:

Doctors who oppose the forced nutrition the name because it would imply a significant violence thus preclude the application of the TF Case?

The question is not whether they are right or wrong. Or whether the TF is right or wrong. Or who should, in a case like this, decide. The question is whether an opposition by doctors on behalf of that argument is yes or no opposition the application of that decision.

Please motivate. It is a blog for Bioethics, is not it. Obviously, be careful: if you give an answer without having read the decision, it may be. But you do not like that, you say eh?

Pain Killer To Take Before Waxing

I continue my rule not to speak of forced nutrition. No but still. Life is much more beautiful than that. not just because the universe is a wonderful place . In the list that would make most people about what makes life beautiful, there must be prominently love. To write, if you want, with plenty of 'a' and 'u'. But that is your business.

In the video, which opens this message - and you will find here - Helen Fisher examines scientific rigor with a wonderful and amazing poetry the feeling s love. A conference that is worth seeing. You certainly will find. In Anyway, if you are a member of the species homo sapiens and not a google robots that spends time on blogging ...

He talks about addiction, and it is not entirely surprising. So if you become addicted to this kind of research, there is another conference in the same kind here.

Saying For Diaper Raffle

We need explorers



I know, I know, I hear a lot of time these tragic cases. So a few posts on these things that make life beautiful. In it, curiosity. At a time when the crisis threatens the budgets of research, including near here, a brief but magnificent conference Brian Cox recalls Why we need explorers . Click on the link or image. And just tell me what you think.

Swollen Stomach After Hernia Surgery

again forced nutrition

hard to remain calm and think in a situation so tense that a hunger strike. In any case, it sometimes gives the impression that reading newspapers commenting on the case of Bernard Rappaz. So a little clarification.

Item 1 - The Geneva-based physicians do not preclude the application of TF Case: they have understood it all.

That case, who has actually read ? This can be explained as follows:

"Proceed to force-feeding violates fundamental rights to freedom of expression and personal integrity of the prisoner. To justify the forced nutrition, so you have a justification in court these transgressions. In Switzerland, limiting a fundamental right requires several conditions. It is necessary that the restriction is justified by public interest. Let. The restriction must be proportionate to that aim. Finally, "the essence of fundamental rights is inviolable . What is the essence of fundamental rights? Here, just know that "the right not to be subjected to punishment or to cruel, inhuman or degrading" is included, and that the federal court explicitly concede. Forced nutrition is therefore justified that if it is not inhuman or degrading treatment. only "if it is done with dignity and in accordance with the rules of the art of medicine" . "

" If it is done with dignity and in accordance with the rules of medical art. " Physicians do not have to comply with any order. Stopping TF clearly excluded from this requirement a scenario: one where nutrition forced represent inhuman and degrading treatment. On this point, law and ethics are in perfect agreement. Which brings us to ...

Item 2 - The law and medical ethics are sometimes at odds, yes, but this is not the main issue here.

From an excellent interview with Alex Mauron in the press today:

"The Federal Court has a caricature of ethics when talking about medical directives of the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences as if it were the alpha and omega of medical ethics. This revolves around the right to self-determination of the patient. It is anchored in the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights in biomedicine is to say in the most basic international law.

Medical ethics does not oppose the law. She is not above the law because its foundations are rooted in the law. "

In fact, the Federal Court also admits this. OK, lip perhaps. Between the lines, no doubt. But he admits. Because you never know if you're in a situation where he can practice a diet 'worthy'? You guessed it: Based on the judgments of clinicians aware of the values of their profession. Where:

Item 3 - Eligibility (legal as well as ethical) nutrition depends, among other forced a clinical trial.

is also one of the criteria identified in the report of the Committee for the Prevention of Torture in a 2009 report on forced nutrition applied in Spain. This review has been quoted as admitting that nutrition can sometimes forced to qualify. It is worthwhile to look at the detail. Here is their advice texto:

"14. If a decision is made to force-feed a prisoner on hunger strike, the CPT's opinion, such a decision should be based on medical necessity and applied in appropriate conditions that reflect the medical nature of the measure. Moreover, the decision process must follow an established procedure containing adequate safeguard, including an independent medical decision. The possibility of legal recourse should be available and all aspects of the implementation of the decision must be monitored adequately
(...)
Nutrition forced a prisoner without meeting these conditions could quite match treatment inhuman and degrading treatment. "

" Including a independent medical decision, which is one of the "watchdog" required. The CPT therefore acknowledges that in effect forced nutrition may be eligible, yes. But only if this conditions, and a few others of course are met.



The threat of justice to prosecute doctors Valais who refuse the order to feed their power is deeply disturbing patient, because it seems based on a combination of these errors. The doctors did not follow an order based on the decision of TF if the situation is not one defined by the TF. And ethical considerations on which these are based physicians are not 'external'. They are 'anchored in the law', and are among the criteria used to define TF as the scope of his arrest: he excludes the possibility of inhuman and degrading treatment.

embarrassing, this threat is also that it gives the impression that the logic of the standoff continues. That the question is who is the strongest. The question is knowing how to get out of this situation honorably. Without sacrificing core values. Or as little as possible.

For that we must abandon the logic of the standoff, exactly. Continue to seek a solution that saves Hwy ant as possible, goat and cabbage. If it exists. When none is that we are faced with a tragic case. A situation where whatever we do there will be a serious transgression. But all the transgressions are not equal. Violating someone's human rights is precisely what is supposed to have decided not to make any money. The TF says so: Swiss law also provides that 'the essence of fundamental rights is inviolable'. In other words, we have decided that it remained to the end of the rights we will not infringe, even in the name of a very very very good cause ...

Plans For A Floating Arm Trebuchet

arlt

How To Build A 2 Seater Go Kart

Euthanasia?

Assisted suicide and active euthanasia where it is legal responses are always extreme, last resort, in the face of human tragedies. Do the best we can respond to human suffering with dignity and respect, that in these cases a task profoundly difficult.

is one reason why the testimony of Dr. Daphne Berner is important. He is also courageous. Admirable, even. Serve with a simple honesty the human drama that is lived, to present reality without first seek to defend themselves, while one is accused of euthanasia, this is a rare example and should be welcomed . When I commented on this case live, I have not had time to say it and I wanted to catch it.

Important, this is the case also for the light it throws on some troubling aspects of assisted dying. Lets see. First law. In Switzerland assisted suicide is legal (Art. 115 Swiss Penal Code) . Euthanasia, not (Art. 114 Swiss Penal Code) . Ethically, the distinction is important. In the case of euthanasia, a person kills another. In the case of assisted suicide, no. But at the same time, this case shows how this limit may be tenuous. Because this is how the facts are described:

(...) the woman had chosen to end his days with the help of Exit. But in time, completely paralyzed except for one foot, the patient could not activate itself drip containing the lethal substance.

Daphne Berner then proposed to the young woman the next thing: "When you move your foot, it's as if you open the seam and it is I who will open it." And to clarify: "She seemed very relieved that my proposal is what we did. She managed to say now and she moved her foot and I opened the controller. There. "

It's always hard to tell from the comfortable distance at which one reads. But if I try to be I sincerely believe that in such a case, if I were convinced that it is the firm resolve of the patient, and if I was no alternative to soothe her pain otherwise I might well do the same thing yes. This is not something we say lightly.

Some of the issues is there. If our response to this case is to think of it, put the person who has found in this case jail was something problematic. So obviously any the issue is not there. As an ethical decision may stick to a singular case. A legal decision, no. And it seems that there are at least two ways of seeing this case.

First, we can see a reason to reopen the debate on the legalization of euthanasia. If it is prohibited, it is because of the prohibition of homicide. But we accept that all cases of homicide (including self-defense) can be justified. If the killing is forbidden to ask a crucial boundary-to-human violence, then a case like this should really be banned?

Read the situation and is to begin by admitting guilt, then eventually ask whether and how the standard problem. Legalize euthanasia? This choice would depend on what we can implement to avoid excesses, and the confidence we have that these measures can be effective. But that choice should also depend on the importance we give to situations like this patient. A people who are too limited by the disease in order to commit suicide, and that can not be used much more of an assisted death. These people, it may seem reasonable to present them die more quickly, anticipate, before losing the ability to commit suicide. And this is also a drift.

But there is a second possible reading of this case. Y see an opportunity for questioning on the boundaries between euthanasia and assisted suicide. This limit is important, but it can not be reduced to abstract issues. For here, that operated the mechanism? If instead of saying 'now', the patient had driven the mechanism of the foot, this trial would certainly not take place. Redefined as assisted suicide case where a competent patient, the physician operates, instead of operating the mechanism for killing himself, can it be? In theoretical terms the usual kind of situation is unthinkable. But there are cases where these theoretical limits are clear, this story shows that it is not always the case. On a philosophical level, which is the agent in this story, the proximal cause of death of the patient? It could probably be debate. In political terms, see here a case of assisted suicide could be a way to recognize the legality of the humane decision of Dr. Daphne Berner, without having to tackle head on the issue of euthanasia in our laws. And without either draw a precedent that might include patients incapable of discernment. That would be a solution rather Swiss, finally.

Sample Letter On Request For Line Disconnection

Nutrition enforced, law and ethics

Officer, timeliness of bioethics times. I'll to short messages. First things first. The Federal Tribunal ruled on the case of Bernard Rappaz. The TF Case are here, but as the site is not obvious to navigate I've made a copy and paste it on here Rappaz.

is a very interesting read that this decision of the Tribunal. The case is difficult. It asks questions pertaining to the role of law as the limit, the rights that we care - or non-prison up to the limits to be put to human violence, the role of professional ethics, and it's just the beginning. But on this point of professional ethics, you understand that I stop. I made a note that appeared in The Times today. You will find it here. Happy reading and come back tell me what you think ...

Should I Use Powder Before Waxing

Barber house

How To Mouthwash For Swab Test Nicotine

sector boom & picola Chuc Suc Khoe dwarf

Misty Mundae Vampire Strangler Watch Online Free

Here! My book "Chuc Suc Khoe - book asia" will be released in bookstores on November 3. And thank you to editions Cambourakis to coming to the end.

In 2006 and 2008, William Benedict has made several lengthy trips to Southeast Asia, Laos, Vietnam and Cambodia. He draws a lot during his travels, and bring several books that constitute the " raw material "of this book. Comic narrative that mixes small adventures and travel stories gleaned over the meetings, the book is punctuated with beaches full of drawings, black and white and color. Urban scenes, portraits sketched from life, landscapes glimpsed from a train or bus: this book gives a very vivid picture of the Asian People's Daily, and casts a distant, sometimes ironic, in the high places of tourism such as Angkor and Halong Bay.

I'll be in Paris next week to dedicate this book,
Thursday, October 28th at 18h at MOUNTED AIR.
(for stunned, there is a new address (very near the old church at the foot of the de Menil): 71 rue de Menilmontant / 2 rue de la Mare - Paris XX - Metro Gambetta & Ménilmontant)

Then, Oct. 30 to, 16h, to Bastille, in the library BDnet, 26, Rue de Charonne
75011 Paris along with the authors of our wars (great book from home Cambourakis too)

Can You Get Herpes From Jeans

hustler

Memorial Wording Fora Wedding Programs

halls