
It won five Oscars, two for Living Free (1966), one for The Lion in Winter (1968), one for Out of Africa (1986) and one for Dances with Wolves (1991).
It won five Oscars, two for Living Free (1966), one for The Lion in Winter (1968), one for Out of Africa (1986) and one for Dances with Wolves (1991).
Thought is a bit simple, if not quite simplistic. In any case well short. However, it has the advantage of being reversible. It could well return as a glove to return to sender " I do not mind straight people, but I blame them for it to become a lobby, a sect, practicing intellectual terrorism ... So I told them "Ladies and gentlemen straight people, do we not care Peace .
course, that does not make much progress in the debate, but it is good sometimes to risk treading water to show how easy it is to quickly get bogged down.
Mr. Myard believes that homosexuality is a perversion and has the right to say it. I like the word "perversion" that smells good pseudoscience. Psychiatrists and psychoanalysts are far away served. There was another word they liked, it was "stupid". The question now is whether I am entitled to say, since I think some members are morons without this being taken as an insult intolerable?
Side Constitutional Council, it is believed that banning gay marriage in the law is consistent with the constitution, even if it invites members to take up the issue, but one hardly sees the current majority to take a step forward one year of presidential elections.
side survey, we learn that 58% of our countrymen are in favor of gay marriage, against 35% who oppose it and 7% who do not care. On adoption by gays, the divide is more subtle: for 49% and 47% cons. But the trend is clear since Ten years ago the favorable opinions were only 30% against an overwhelming 68% against!
The truth probably lies in the fear of death. Fear of dying, of course, but also the hypothetical "after" or the enigmatic "during". They are so scared of all this, along with the idea of having to leave the scene, they want to drink the cup to the last drop, or even lick from one language to ensure that greedy it Still, the smallest particle. Their terror is such that they do not support the idea that others may think otherwise, want to retire on time, when there is still a hint of dignity.
For the reality is there, how can they look in a mirror and say that perhaps those who want to leave as soon as possible who are right, there is the courage to admit defeat, when they themselves have only their cowardice as an engine to their stubbornness.
"Life is so precious! "We bombard they. But when there is more than a simulacrum of life? And first, how to define it? Is it simply a beating heart when all other functions are turned off? I want to live upright and moving, I never could stand outside the supine sleep and love, if I can not move, read, hear, think, then I'm already dead and euthanasia be a regularization.
I remember a boy of thirty years, a brilliant scientist, reduced to a vegetable by a car accident with no particular gravity, simply because his head had struck the top of the door. It took ten years to finally die, spend time looking at unbearable slow, almost not moving, had virtually no activity, but retaining enough clarity to take the measure of his condition. Having nearly lost his speech, he made superhuman efforts to call to his father, "Kill me! "In the fury of doctors and his family to keep him alive, I do not think there was humanity but simply a selfish maniac.
course medicine is making progress from daily observation of the cases submitted to it and experiments done on them. Of course, we value our family and have great difficulty accepting their death and we want to delay it as much as possible. I understand all these arguments, he simply seems to me that are quite many who aspire to the stubbornness that we can leave in peace those who do not.
ago that some can not say for fear of being disowned by most right-thinking, and also what others do not mean by sheer inability to confront the conflicts that their words might lead to their interlocutor. In both cases, this distorts any communication, creating misunderstandings which may arise from many embarrassing situations.
I have more and more difficult to understand and support this kind of behavior. I feel I lose my time precious to decipher the platitudes that are only expressed in a tortuous if not downright twisted. The fact that to love the simplicity and authenticity made me more more a social misfit. For I know there's no mistaking the real social relations today are those that I reject and those whom I advocate have any chance of being accused of the worst perversions.